[VOTE] Require Java 6

[David E. Jones-2]

Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any release branch.

[+1] Java 6 or later
[+0] Abstain
[-1] Continue to support Java 5

+1

Marco

Il giorno 30/nov/2009, alle ore 22.40, David E Jones ha scritto:

>
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>

[Adam Heath-2]

David E Jones wrote:
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5

+1

[Tim Ruppert]

+1

Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

On Nov 30, 2009, at 2:40 PM, David E Jones wrote:

>
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java  
> 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would  
> allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those  
> OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this  
> change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any  
> release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>

[Adrian Crum]

+1

-Adrian

David E Jones wrote:
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>
>

[byersa]

+1
-Al

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:40 PM, David E Jones <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>
>

[Scott Gray-2]

+1

Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

On 1/12/2009, at 10:40 AM, David E Jones wrote:

>
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java  
> 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would  
> allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those  
> OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this  
> change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any  
> release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>

[Jacques Le Roux]

+1

Jacques

From: "David E Jones" <[hidden email]>
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would
> allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that
> this change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>

[hans_bakker]

+1

Hans

On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 14:40 -0700, David E Jones wrote:
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>
--
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates

[Anil Patel-3]

+1

Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/apache-ofbiz-blog/

On Nov 30, 2009, at 4:40 PM, David E Jones wrote:

>
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>

[Ashish Vijaywargiya]

+1

--
Ashish

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:10 AM, David E Jones <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for
> OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that
> relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run
> on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only
> and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>
>

[Manuel Desdin]

+1

Thanks, Manuel.

On Nov 30, 2009, at 4:40 PM, David E Jones wrote:

>
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java  
> 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would  
> allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those  
> OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this  
> change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any  
> release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>

[Erwan de FERRIERES-3]

+ 1


--
Erwan

[Malin Nicolas]

+1

David E Jones a écrit :
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>
>  


--
Nicolas MALIN
Consultant
Tél : [phone]
Site projet : http://www.neogia.org/
-------
Société LibrenBerry
Tél : [phone]
Site : http://www.librenberry.net/

[Antoine Vittecoq]

+1
Le lundi 30 novembre 2009 22:40:09, David E Jones a écrit :

> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for
>  OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that
>  relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run
>  on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk
>  only and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>

--
Antoine Vittecoq

[Bilgin Ibryam-2]

+ 1

Bilgin

David E Jones wrote:
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>
>  

[Matthieu Bollot-4]

+1

matthieu

Le lundi 30 novembre 2009 à 14:40 -0700, David E Jones a écrit :
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>

[varadasrini]

+1

- Srinivas V
Developer

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:10 AM, David E Jones <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for
> OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that
> relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run
> on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only
> and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>
>

[Christian Geisert]

David E Jones schrieb:
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5

+1

--
Christian

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:40 PM, David E Jones wrote:

>
> Please vote on whether or not we should require Java 6 (aka Java 1.6) for OFBiz going forward. This basically means that we would allow code that relies on Java 6 APIs, and that because of those OFBiz would no longer run on Java 5 (aka Java 1.5). Note that this change would be for the trunk only and would not apply to any release branch.
>
> [+1] Java 6 or later
> [+0] Abstain
> [-1] Continue to support Java 5
>

+1

Jacopo