Test ALL screens automatically?

[Jacques Le Roux]

Just had an idea: could we not build a mechanism which would test ALL screens automatically?
Not to be run with run-tests but from time to time when we do major or deep overhauls.
Of course this would not be JUnit tests but more using Selenium WebDriver or the kind, like what Erwan was lastly working on.

Maybe there is something already that I'm not aware of?

This would be a good regression test, I believe

Jacques

[Medhat]

Hi Jacques,

Using packages like Selenium WebDriver which is the successor of Selenium
remote control or Selenium Grid which controls and distribute test cases
load on many Selenium remote control needs a lot of configurations and
environment settings.
Do you think project like this will be part of the ofbiz distribution or
will only done on the server holding the demo-trunk?

Regards,
Medhat



On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> Just had an idea: could we not build a mechanism which would test ALL
> screens automatically?
> Not to be run with run-tests but from time to time when we do major or
> deep overhauls.
> Of course this would not be JUnit tests but more using Selenium WebDriver
> or the kind, like what Erwan was lastly working on.
>
> Maybe there is something already that I'm not aware of?
>
> This would be a good regression test, I believe
>
> Jacques
>

[hans_bakker]

Hi Jacques,

we are running selenium tests on our demo server every day on
developments we do for our customers and tried to make this part of the
ofbiz package.....

So sure, i completely agree......

Regards,
Hans


On 05/08/2013 10:16 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Just had an idea: could we not build a mechanism which would test ALL screens automatically?
> Not to be run with run-tests but from time to time when we do major or deep overhauls.
> Of course this would not be JUnit tests but more using Selenium WebDriver or the kind, like what Erwan was lastly working on.
>
> Maybe there is something already that I'm not aware of?
>
> This would be a good regression test, I believe
>
> Jacques