Re: svn commit: r886060 - in /ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt: config/ data/helpdata/ webapp/birt/ webapp/birt/WEB-INF/ webapp/birt/birt/ webapp/birt/webcontent/ widget/

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r886060 - in /ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt: config/ data/helpdata/ webapp/birt/ webapp/birt/WEB-INF/ webapp/birt/birt/ webapp/birt/webcontent/ widget/

Adam Heath-2
[hidden email] wrote:

> Author: hansbak
> Date: Wed Dec  2 06:38:17 2009
> New Revision: 886060
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=886060&view=rev
> Log:
>  remove viewer screen, menu, ftl and remove viewer content from help file and delete all js, jsp, css, image files and viewer.properties files. This to meet the license concerns of Scott reported in the mailing list
>
> Removed:
>     ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/webapp/birt/CancelTask.jsp
>     ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/webapp/birt/WEB-INF/viewer.properties
>     ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/webapp/birt/birt/viewer.ftl
>     ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/webapp/birt/webcontent/
> Modified:
>     ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/config/BirtUiLabels.xml
>     ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/data/helpdata/HELP_BIRT.xml
>     ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/webapp/birt/WEB-INF/controller.xml
>     ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/webapp/birt/WEB-INF/web.xml
>     ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/widget/BirtScreens.xml
>     ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/widget/Menus.xml

You're gonna love this, but there might be a better way.

The question was wether the 'source' files, the ftl and jsp files that
came from BIRT were allowed to be included in an apache project.  EPL
*compiled* files can, but not source files.

So, take all their 'source' files, move them into a .war, then make
ofbiz accept wars.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r886060 - in /ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt: config/ data/helpdata/ webapp/birt/ webapp/birt/WEB-INF/ webapp/birt/birt/ webapp/birt/webcontent/ widget/

Tim Ruppert
I'd still ask legal on this topic, but it could make sense.

Cheers,
Ruppert

On Dec 1, 2009, at 11:44 PM, Adam Heath wrote:

> [hidden email] wrote:
>> Author: hansbak
>> Date: Wed Dec  2 06:38:17 2009
>> New Revision: 886060
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=886060&view=rev
>> Log:
>> remove viewer screen, menu, ftl and remove viewer content from help  
>> file and delete all js, jsp, css, image files and viewer.properties  
>> files. This to meet the license concerns of Scott reported in the  
>> mailing list
>>
>> Removed:
>>    ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/webapp/birt/CancelTask.jsp
>>    ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/webapp/birt/WEB-INF/
>> viewer.properties
>>    ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/webapp/birt/birt/viewer.ftl
>>    ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/webapp/birt/webcontent/
>> Modified:
>>    ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/config/BirtUiLabels.xml
>>    ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/data/helpdata/HELP_BIRT.xml
>>    ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/webapp/birt/WEB-INF/
>> controller.xml
>>    ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/webapp/birt/WEB-INF/web.xml
>>    ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/widget/BirtScreens.xml
>>    ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt/widget/Menus.xml
>
> You're gonna love this, but there might be a better way.
>
> The question was wether the 'source' files, the ftl and jsp files that
> came from BIRT were allowed to be included in an apache project.  EPL
> *compiled* files can, but not source files.
>
> So, take all their 'source' files, move them into a .war, then make
> ofbiz accept wars.
>


smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: svn commit: r886060 - in /ofbiz/branches/addbirt/framework/birt: config/ data/helpdata/ webapp/birt/ webapp/birt/WEB-INF/ webapp/birt/birt/ webapp/birt/webcontent/ widget/

Adam Heath-2
Tim Ruppert wrote:
> I'd still ask legal on this topic, but it could make sense.

And if it is allowed, then it shows that legal is stupid and broken.
Either both ways are allowed, or neither.