Re: svn commit: r1345849 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp: config/url.properties src/org/ofbiz/webapp/view/ApacheFopWorker.java

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

On Jun 4, 2012, at 9:33 AM, [hidden email] wrote:

> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/config/url.properties?rev=1345849&r1=1345848&r2=1345849&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/config/url.properties (original)
> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/config/url.properties Mon Jun  4 07:33:24 2012
> @@ -43,3 +43,9 @@ link.remove_lsessionid.user_agent_list =
> # Should HTTP parameters sent to services require encryption?
> # This is generally advised for more secure webapps as it makes it more difficult to spoof requests (XSRF) that change data.
> service.http.parameters.require.encrypted=Y
> +
> +# FOP configurable folder
> +fop.path=component://webapp/config
> +# Font path for FOP
> +fop.font.base.path=component://webapp/config/
> +

Hans,

why are you using this file and not fop.properties?

Jacopo

[hans_bakker]

for only 2 parameters create a new properties file looks to me a bit too
much....

On 06/04/2012 05:24 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

> On Jun 4, 2012, at 9:33 AM, [hidden email] wrote:
>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/config/url.properties?rev=1345849&r1=1345848&r2=1345849&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/config/url.properties (original)
>> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/config/url.properties Mon Jun  4 07:33:24 2012
>> @@ -43,3 +43,9 @@ link.remove_lsessionid.user_agent_list =
>> # Should HTTP parameters sent to services require encryption?
>> # This is generally advised for more secure webapps as it makes it more difficult to spoof requests (XSRF) that change data.
>> service.http.parameters.require.encrypted=Y
>> +
>> +# FOP configurable folder
>> +fop.path=component://webapp/config
>> +# Font path for FOP
>> +fop.font.base.path=component://webapp/config/
>> +
>
> Hans,
>
> why are you using this file and not fop.properties?
>
> Jacopo
>

[Jacopo Cappellato-4]

On Jun 8, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:

> for only 2 parameters create a new properties file looks to me a bit too much....

Yes, you are right Hans; when I wrote I was thinking that the file already existed (I got confused with fop.xconf).

Jacopo

>
> On 06/04/2012 05:24 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> On Jun 4, 2012, at 9:33 AM, [hidden email] wrote:
>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/config/url.properties?rev=1345849&r1=1345848&r2=1345849&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/config/url.properties (original)
>>> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/config/url.properties Mon Jun  4 07:33:24 2012
>>> @@ -43,3 +43,9 @@ link.remove_lsessionid.user_agent_list =
>>> # Should HTTP parameters sent to services require encryption?
>>> # This is generally advised for more secure webapps as it makes it more difficult to spoof requests (XSRF) that change data.
>>> service.http.parameters.require.encrypted=Y
>>> +
>>> +# FOP configurable folder
>>> +fop.path=component://webapp/config
>>> +# Font path for FOP
>>> +fop.font.base.path=component://webapp/config/
>>> +
>>
>> Hans,
>>
>> why are you using this file and not fop.properties?
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>