|
Hello all, and especially Hans, One thing on my pre-release-branch to do list is to move the myportal component to the framework, as part of my deviant future plans for the component (basically an easy tool for data-driven role-specific UIs that use portlets based on screens from applications and other components. I'd like to do this soon (in the next day or two) and work on extracting non-framework things too. While I've mentioned this before, I wanted to throw out a heads-up (especially to Hans) and also request feedback before going for it. -David |
|
David,
i am at the moment working to move the communicationEvents part back into the party component under a new tabkey 'myCommuncations' . Communications, mycommunications and the portlet "communications" all use the same screens and forms. It is taking however longer then i thought. I hope to have this finished the end of this week. Moving the other parts, time registration, tasks, company-events, invoice and custrequets should be less work, but still a number of days.. so to be honest i am not ready to move yet..... Regards, Hans On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 22:52 -0600, David E Jones wrote: > Hello all, and especially Hans, > > One thing on my pre-release-branch to do list is to move the myportal > component to the framework, as part of my deviant future plans for the > component (basically an easy tool for data-driven role-specific UIs > that use portlets based on screens from applications and other > components. > > I'd like to do this soon (in the next day or two) and work on > extracting non-framework things too. > > While I've mentioned this before, I wanted to throw out a heads-up > (especially to Hans) and also request feedback before going for it. > > -David > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates |
|
In reply to this post by David E Jones-3
Should we also consider a new name for the framework component? I.e.
"portal" instead of "myPortal" Jacopo On Mar 25, 2009, at 5:52 AM, David E Jones wrote: > > Hello all, and especially Hans, > > One thing on my pre-release-branch to do list is to move the > myportal component to the framework, as part of my deviant future > plans for the component (basically an easy tool for data-driven role- > specific UIs that use portlets based on screens from applications > and other components. > > I'd like to do this soon (in the next day or two) and work on > extracting non-framework things too. > > While I've mentioned this before, I wanted to throw out a heads-up > (especially to Hans) and also request feedback before going for it. > > -David > > |
|
I like that idea.
-Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Should we also consider a new name for the framework component? I.e. > "portal" instead of "myPortal" > > Jacopo > > On Mar 25, 2009, at 5:52 AM, David E Jones wrote: > >> >> Hello all, and especially Hans, >> >> One thing on my pre-release-branch to do list is to move the myportal >> component to the framework, as part of my deviant future plans for the >> component (basically an easy tool for data-driven role-specific UIs >> that use portlets based on screens from applications and other >> components. >> >> I'd like to do this soon (in the next day or two) and work on >> extracting non-framework things too. >> >> While I've mentioned this before, I wanted to throw out a heads-up >> (especially to Hans) and also request feedback before going for it. >> >> -David >> >> > |
|
In reply to this post by Jacopo Cappellato-4
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> Should we also consider a new name for the framework component? I.e. > "portal" instead of "myPortal" Careful; that's how we lost Mars. |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
