|
Administrator
|
I have planned to handle a little change in the OFBiz Contributors Best Practices page.
I think there are no other places this was mentionned. Jacques From: "Doug Cutting" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Cc: "Apache Infrastructure" <[hidden email]> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:28 PM Subject: Re: Upcoming JIRA Upgrade > An few clarifications about the removal of the license checkbox plugin: > > 1. Contrary to Tony's prior message, only attachments that were *not* > submitted under the Apache > license will be renamed after this upgrade. > > 2. According to the Apache license, contributions to Apache-licensed > projects are under the Apache license by default, so the checkbox was > only useful to specify that an attachment was *not* intended to be a > contribution. > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#contributions > > 3. In the future, without the checkbox, one may instead add a comment > stating when an attachment is not intended for contribution. > > 4. Removing this plugin will make it much easier for us to keep Jira > updated to its latest version so that we can more rapidly get Jira > bugfixes deployed. > > Doug > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Tony Stevenson <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> This Friday at 8am BST (http://s.apache.org/jiraup) I will be upgrading our JIRA instance as we have fallen behind on patches a >> little, lately. >> >> The update itself will take us to the latest JIRA version, however as a consequence of this the ASF plugin license will not be >> carried forward. In other words the tick box selection to grant the license will be removed, as will the review page item that >> shows if someone has elected to select this option historically. >> >> To ensure that we maintain a view on who has historically granted the license, all files that were attached with this license >> granted will be renamed to have a prefix. So for example, if the original file was named 'lucene-101.diff' it will be renamed to >> 'ASF.LICENSE.GRANTED--lucene-101.diff' >> >> Going forward we will not be collecting this piece of data or requiring people to name their files in any special way. >> >> The upgrade is expected to last a few hours if all things go well. I hope to have service restored within 4 hours, but it may >> drag on if the renaming takes a long while. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> Tony >> >> On behalf of the Apache Infrastructure Team >> >> --------------------------------------- >> Tony Stevenson >> >> [hidden email] // [hidden email] >> [hidden email] >> >> http://blog.pc-tony.com >> >> GPG - 1024D/51047D66 >> -------------------------------------- >> >> > |
|
Administrator
|
Done
Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[hidden email]> >I have planned to handle a little change in the OFBiz Contributors Best Practices page. > I think there are no other places this was mentionned. > > Jacques > > From: "Doug Cutting" <[hidden email]> > To: <[hidden email]> > Cc: "Apache Infrastructure" <[hidden email]> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:28 PM > Subject: Re: Upcoming JIRA Upgrade > >> An few clarifications about the removal of the license checkbox plugin: >> >> 1. Contrary to Tony's prior message, only attachments that were *not* >> submitted under the Apache >> license will be renamed after this upgrade. >> >> 2. According to the Apache license, contributions to Apache-licensed >> projects are under the Apache license by default, so the checkbox was >> only useful to specify that an attachment was *not* intended to be a >> contribution. >> >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#contributions >> >> 3. In the future, without the checkbox, one may instead add a comment >> stating when an attachment is not intended for contribution. >> >> 4. Removing this plugin will make it much easier for us to keep Jira >> updated to its latest version so that we can more rapidly get Jira >> bugfixes deployed. >> >> Doug >> >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Tony Stevenson <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Folks, >>> >>> This Friday at 8am BST (http://s.apache.org/jiraup) I will be upgrading our JIRA instance as we have fallen behind on patches a >>> little, lately. >>> >>> The update itself will take us to the latest JIRA version, however as a consequence of this the ASF plugin license will not be >>> carried forward. In other words the tick box selection to grant the license will be removed, as will the review page item that >>> shows if someone has elected to select this option historically. >>> >>> To ensure that we maintain a view on who has historically granted the license, all files that were attached with this license >>> granted will be renamed to have a prefix. So for example, if the original file was named 'lucene-101.diff' it will be renamed >>> to 'ASF.LICENSE.GRANTED--lucene-101.diff' >>> >>> Going forward we will not be collecting this piece of data or requiring people to name their files in any special way. >>> >>> The upgrade is expected to last a few hours if all things go well. I hope to have service restored within 4 hours, but it may >>> drag on if the renaming takes a long while. >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tony >>> >>> On behalf of the Apache Infrastructure Team >>> >>> --------------------------------------- >>> Tony Stevenson >>> >>> [hidden email] // [hidden email] >>> [hidden email] >>> >>> http://blog.pc-tony.com >>> >>> GPG - 1024D/51047D66 >>> -------------------------------------- >>> >>> >> |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
