Code coverage

[Erwan de FERRIERES]

Hi all,

while taking a new look to code coverage, will it be hard to use emma
instead of cobertura ?
In this case, we could include the library to OFBiz, as it is under a
CPL license.

Cheers,

--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz

[Adam Heath-2]

Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> while taking a new look to code coverage, will it be hard to use emma
> instead of cobertura ?
> In this case, we could include the library to OFBiz, as it is under a
> CPL license.

Not super hard, no; I wrote the interface to be extensible with other
tools.

[Adam Heath-2]

Adam Heath wrote:

> Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> while taking a new look to code coverage, will it be hard to use emma
>> instead of cobertura ?
>> In this case, we could include the library to OFBiz, as it is under a
>> CPL license.
>
> Not super hard, no; I wrote the interface to be extensible with other
> tools.

I'm looking at it's sample reports, and I like cobertura's better.  I
don't know if it is the same data, tho.

I'll look into adding support for it.

[Adam Heath-2]

Adam Heath wrote:

> Adam Heath wrote:
>> Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> while taking a new look to code coverage, will it be hard to use emma
>>> instead of cobertura ?
>>> In this case, we could include the library to OFBiz, as it is under a
>>> CPL license.
>> Not super hard, no; I wrote the interface to be extensible with other
>> tools.
>
> I'm looking at it's sample reports, and I like cobertura's better.  I
> don't know if it is the same data, tho.
>
> I'll look into adding support for it.

Actually, emma doesn't look like it's maintained anymore.  Last
download available was made back in 2005.

[Erwan de FERRIERES]

On 17/02/2010 20:53, Adam Heath wrote:
../..

> Actually, emma doesn't look like it's maintained anymore.  Last
> download available was made back in 2005.
>
It's why I saw too...


--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz