|
|
We are trying to understand the proper usage for the accounting transaction / entries as they relate to the related entities such as partyId, invoiceId, shipmentId, etc. What I do not understand is when the related entities should be populated on the acctgTransEntry entity. The specific example I am looking at is the creation of an INCOMING_PAYMENT (by the createAcctgTransAndEntriesForIncomingPayment service).
This service is invoked when a payment's status is set to RECEIVED (via SECA). What I do not understand is that while the acctgTrans entity has the partyId set and the roleTypeId set to BILL_TO_CUSTOMER the acctgTransEntity does not have the similar partyId/roleTypeId populated. In other transactions the entities partyId does get populated (for example a PAYMENT_APPL transaction and various sales related transaction types).
Is it possible that this is a bug in the creation of INCOMING_PAYMENT type transaction entries?
|
Locked
